Skip to main content

EOTO 2: Confirmation Bias



A Breakdown of the Impact of Confirmation Bias

Can AI Algorithms be Biased? - Towards Data Science
Photo above found here

When I looked at the phrase "confirmation bias," I wondered how damaging could it really be to a world where so many people interact with so many other people's opinions. The answer is it could be very damaging to the truth behind a situation. So what is confirmation bias? Confirmation bias is "the tendency to process information by looking for, or interpreting, information that is consistent with one’s existing beliefs." Due to this, when you come across information that is inconsistent with your belief,  you often automatically dismiss it as incorrect. In a simple, non-damaging example, if you were to meet a person with brown hair, and they were annoying, you would assume everyone with brown hair is annoying. When you meet another person with brown hair that actually was annoying, it will confirm your belief that all brown-haired people are annoying, even though that's not reasonably true. 

Attached here and shown below is a link to examples of confirmation bias and how to think more logically when presented with information that disagrees with something you currently believe. 


History

Humans are known to process information they receive in an "illogical, biased manner" (Casad). Confirmation bias in another example of that, and is even more common to see happen when the information being given to them directly impacts their values or personal feelings. This is why when discusses politics, it is something that occurs so often. People's political viewpoints and parties are often a direct correlation to their morals and values as human beings. When someone has no interest in the topic of discussion, it is rare for confirmation bias to occur. Another reason confirmation bias occurs is due to a person's self-esteem. People naturally do not want to be wrong, and admitting that an opinion or fact you once believed in can be proven incorrect, rather than reassured for its correctness, could "suggest one is lacking intelligence" (Casad). 

Evidence

There is proof that confirmation bias occurs when decision making and formulating ideas. "In studies examining the my-side bias, people were able to generate and remember more reasons supporting their side of a controversial issue than the opposing side. Only when a researcher directly asked people to generate arguments against their own beliefs were they able to do so" (Casad). This shows that people are able to "generate" other ideas, but often do not want to believe in them due to their previous confirmed belief. People are more likely to find positive information to reaffirm their beliefs, rather than allowing themselves to run into negative information that would be contrary to their current beliefs. Confirmation bias happens more than just when being presented with information; it also occurs when meeting new people. "If people are told what to expect from a person they are about to meet...people will look for information that supports their expectations" (Casad). If I met someone and I was told they were really smart and were going to be a lawyer one day, confirmation bias would incline me to ask them where their favorite place to study on campus is rather their where their favorite place to party on campus is. That is because with the information I was given before, I already thought they would be the type of person to study on Saturday nights, rather than go out with friends. 

Why does confirmation bias matter?

Confirmation bias matters because people might allow themselves to believe something that is false due to their ability to find other false information that reaffirms them. Just because two sources say the same thing, doesn't mean that those two sources are true. It also matters in some of the most important professions such as medicine and law. When a doctor is given a patient, based on little to no scientific information, they may believe a diagnosis for a particular patient, without allowing themselves to hear or learn all of the symptoms or pains that the patient is dealing with. This preexisting bias may lead the doctor to treat the patient for what they "believe" they have, rather than what they really have (Casad). In the example of law, due to the judge or the jury preexisting biases about a person or situation, they may not allow themselves to hear the whole story from both sides before coming to their decision. This form of confirmation bias is important to be able to spot and avoid, especially when the decisions that these judges and jurors are making could result in people's lives being spent in jail or prisons for something they didn't do. 



Casad, B. (2019, October 09). Confirmation bias. Retrieved July 04, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Extra Blog: 4th of July in Washington, DC

This Wasn't a Normal 4th of July Holiday for Many Americans While many Americans experienced 4th of July differently this year, with closed beaches in California, no firework shows in much of New England to discourage crowds gatherings, and parades being canceled, other Americans gathered on the lawn at the President's invite despite spiking coronavirus numbers nationwide and outrage for many Black Americans who were not granted freedom until June 19, 1868, almost 92 years after July 4, 1776. Enslaved Black Americans watched 4th of July celebrations of freedom for their fellow White Americans for almost 100 years before being granted freedom themselves. This has been a new topic discussed on social media within the past few weeks and with the current political climate, was never, to my knowledge, addressed by the current President. The President named the event that took place yesterday on the lawn "Salute to America." It's almost as if he is asking us t

Blog #3: Current Event

Freedom of Speech Being Denied by Police Force While we have seen protestors swarm the streets the country, in small suburbs to big cities, the police have met peaceful protestors with violent forces such as teargas, rubber bullets, and arrests. It is undeniable that destruction was done by looters and rioters as well, but when people peacefully protesting are being stripped aware of their First Amendment rights, more anger began to stir in these communities. Peacefully protesting is protected by the First Amendment in the following lines: "abridging the freedom of speech...or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." In this scenario, protestors are having their voices heard; they are doing so peaceful. And they are asking for change within our police and law enforcement systems after the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. This specific  article  gives light to a situation that took place

Blog 4: Black Lives Matter

Should We Be Scared to Demand Justice? When reading this article , a few sections held a heavy weight when it came to the rights each citizen has that are protected by the First Amendment. First, rioting, in its pure definition, is not protected by the First Amendment, but peaceably assembly is. In addition, the riots during this time and acts that they were making at these protests were acts of expressive action to enact reform in our government, its policies, and its law enforcement, and would be protected my the First Amendment. Second and probably often overlooked in scenarios like this one, freedom of speech would apply to attorneys being allowed to wear "Black Lives Matter" pins in courtrooms since that is public property. If violence is not taking place at a peaceful protest, why is there the need for added fear from police or military in combat or riot gear? Does the fear that they inflict on us as citizens infringe on our First Amendment right to peaceably assem